Changes in the Geographic Pattern of Iran's International Collaboration in Cardiovascular Research: A 15-Year Period

Document Type: Systematic Review

Authors

1 Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Crdiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Baqiyatallah Research Center for gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (BRCGL), Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Trauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Medicine, Quran and Hadith Research Center Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems biology and poisonings institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) which are considered as the major public health problems, result in substantial increases in economic and health care costs, and are the first leading cause of death worldwide. Clinical research are the backbone of attempts to build and conduct evidence-based policies to perform the best caring of CVDs. International collaborations, increase the quality of research. Therefore, the present study was conducted in order to assess the changes in the geographic pattern of Iran's international cardiovascular research collaborations.
Methods: This study was a systematic review with scientometrics approaches. Numbers and rates of international research collaborations were extracted from the "Web of Science" database. Results are reported as figures by Graph Pad v6 and Arc GIS v7 software.
Results: The results showed that, 18.3% of all Iran's cardiovascular research have been conducted with international collaborations. The increasing rates were 14.4%, 16.5%, and 21.3% in the time periods of 2004-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019, respectively. The obtained results indicated that, the United States was the first research partner of Iran in the field of cardiovascular and the other partners were England, Australia, Italy and Poland; respectively.
Conclusion: This study provides a global description of a changing pattern of the international research collaboration behavior of Iran and also indicates that the international research collaboration follow a logical trend in the cardiovascular field. Building effective international research collaboration networks as well as encouraging researchers to work in these networks can be considered by policy makers in university levels in the future.

Keywords


1. Rahimi Bashar F, Vahedian-Azimi A, Salesi M, Hosseini Zijoud SM. The Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on the Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction: Review Study. Journal of Military Medicine. 2017;19(4):326-35.
2. Prabhakaran P, Ajay VS, Prabhakaran D, Gottumukkala AK, Shrihari JS, Snehi U, et al. Global cardiovascular disease research survey. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007 Dec 11;50(24):2322-8. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.040
3. Vamadevan AS, Shah BR, Califf RM, Prabhakaran D. Cardiovascular research in India: a perspective. American heart journal. 2011 Mar;161(3):431-8. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.042
4. Sarraf-Zadegan N, Boshtam M, Rafiei M. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in Isfahan. Eur J Pub Health.1999;9(1): 20-6.
5. Zhang Y, Kou J, Zhang XG, Zhang L, Liu SW, Cao XY, Wang YD, Wei RB, Cai GY, Chen XM. The evolution of academic performance in nine subspecialties of internal medicine: an analysis of journal citation reports from 1998 to 2010. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048290
6. Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ. The use of systematic reviews when designing studies. ClinTrials. 2005;2:260-264. doi:10.1191/1740774505cn090oa
7. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? Brit Med J. 2008;336:1472-1474. doi:10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47
8. Rahimi M, Fattahi R. Scientific collaboration and information production: a glance at concepts and current models of co-authorship. Faslname-ye ketab. 2007;18(3):235-48.
9. Glanzel W, Schubert A: Analyzing scientific networks through coauthorship. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Edited by Moed HF, Glanzel W, Schmoch U. Dordrecht: 2005 (pp. 257-276). Springer Netherlands.
10. Adams J: Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature 2013, 497:557–560. doi:10.1038/497557a
11. Persson O. Are highly cited papers more international?. Scientometrics. 2010 May 1;83(2):397-401. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2019.1692837
12. van den Besselaar P, Hemlin S, van der Weijden I. Collaboration and competition in research. Higher Education Policy. 2012 Sep 1;25(3):263-6. doi:10.1057/hep.2012.16
13. Mehrazmay A, Karambakhsh A, Salesi M. Reporting quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in nephrology urology monthly journal. Nephro-urology monthly. 2015 Jul;7(4). doi: 10.5812/numonthly.28752
14. Cronin B, Shaw D. Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation. 1999 Oct 1;55(4):402-8.
15. Moed HF. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006 Mar 30.
16. Beaver D, Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific coauthorship. Scientometrics. 1978 Sep 26;1(1):65-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02016840
17. De Beaver D, Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration: Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics. 1979 Jan 26;1(2):133-49.
18. Luukkonen T, Persson O, Sivertsen G. Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values. 1992 Jan 1;17(1):101-26. doi:10.1177/016224399201700106
19. Luukkonen T, Tijssen R, Persson O, Sivertsen G. The measurement of international scientific collaboration.Scientometrics. 1993 Sep 26;28(1):15-36. doi:10.1007/BF02016282
20. Beaver DD. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics. 2001 Nov 1;52(3):365-77. doi:10.1023/A:1014254214337
21. Yu Q, Shao H, He P, Duan Z. World scientific collaboration in coronary heart disease research. International journal of cardiology. 2013 Aug 10;167(3):631-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.134
22. Farahani HS, Eskrootchi R, Mohaghegh N, Hosseini AF. A study of scientific collaboration in Iranian cardiovascular articles in web of science; 2002-2011. Journal of Health Administration (JHA). 014;17(56):Pe46-55.